Financial Support While Your Divorce is Pending: Interpretation of the New Statute

A recent decision by the New Jersey Superior Court (Ocean County) dispels a common misconception in how parties argue (and judges decide) pendente lite (while the divorce is pending) applications for alimony. This decision enunciates a standard with which pendente lite alimony applications could be adjudicated in light of the 2014 amendments to New Jersey’s alimony statute.

ALIMONY & RETIREMENT: WHEN IS THE RIGHT TIME UNDER NJ‘S AMENDED ALIMONY STATUTE?

The issue of when to retire and how retirement will affect a payor’s alimony obligation is not new to family law practitioners, judges or litigants.  What has evolved is the consideration of when to retire under New Jersey’s recently amended alimony statute.  Under New Jersey's recently amended alimony statute, a party may seek to terminate or modify his or her spousal support obligation based upon an actual or prospective retirement. 

Change of Circumstance, Alimony, Child Support, and the Impact of Additional Non-Marital Children

In the unpublished decision by the New Jersey Appellate Court, Karkoszka v. Karkoszka, the appellate court issued a decision after reviewing a trial court’s denial of a post-divorce (i.e., post-judgment) motion to change alimony and child support based on the birth of a non-marital child.  The case was not one of first impression, but did reiterate the standard for a modification of alimony and child support when a non-marital child is born to the alimony and child support paying spouse. 

Welcome to Riker Danzig’s Family Law Blog!

Welcome! I want to sincerely thank you for viewing Riker Danzig’s Family Law Blog.   Our hope with this blog is to provide updates and valuable information to individuals seeking facts about the ever changing area of family law in New Jersey. 

LGBT: Marriage Yes; Fertility Treatment - Not in New Jersey

In what may be considered more of a constitutional or even insurance law issue, rather than a family law issue, two lesbian couples have filed a federal civil rights suit challenging the constitutionality of the New Jersey law that requires insurance companies to offer fertility treatment to heterosexual women, but not to those in same-sex relationships.