The Eleventh Circuit dealt a win for providers in United States v. AseraCare, ruling that a mere difference of clinical opinion among physicians is not enough to prove “falsity” under the False Claims Act. The Eleventh Circuit’s decision emphasizes that reasonable differences of opinion between physician reviewers of medical documentation are not sufficient to suggest that the judgments concerning a particular patient’s eligibility for Medicare’s hospice benefit, or any claims submitted based on such judgments, are false for purposes of the False Claims Act.
Pricing Transparency Rules: As previously reported on November 22nd, we anticipated that the Department of Health would publish the transparency rules in the Federal Register on November 27th. Today, the Department of Health published in the Federal Register the final Rule requiring hospitals to disclose pricing information and the proposed Transparency in Coverage Rule requiring insurers, among other things, to disclose cost-sharing information.
As we previously reported, on November 15, 2019, CMS issued a final rule and comment period that revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for Calendar Year 2020. In that final rule, CMS made clear that it intends to continue with its policy to require hospitals to publicly disclose "standard charges," including payer-specific negotiated rates. CMS, however, did not actually publish the final rule in the registry and, instead, CMS stated it “received over 1,400 comments on our proposed requirements for hospitals to make public their standard charges.
Ambulatory Surgery Center Prospective Payment System
84 FR 61142 – Final Rule with Comment Period – This final rule with comment period revises the Medicare hospital outpatient prospective payment system (OPPS) and the Medicare ambulatory surgical center (ASC) payment system for Calendar Year (CY) 2020. On average for all covered procedures in ASCs, payment rates went up by 2.6%.
New Jersey State Regulation Expanding Graduates of International Medical Schools
51 N.J.R. 1597(a) – Proposed Regulation -- This proposal by the State Board of Medical Examiners (Board) is to update the eligibility requirements for graduates of international medical schools who seek licensure or authorization to engage in the practice of medicine as residents. If approved, the proposed amendments would allow the Board to rely on recognized accrediting bodies for international medical schools that adhere to standards substantially similar to the bodies that currently accredit domestic medical schools.
Federal Regulatory Update:
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently published 84 FR 59549, requiring annual inflation-related increases to the civil monetary penalties associated with the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015 (the Act). The Act aims to improve the effectiveness of civil monetary penalties and to maintain a deterrent effect against violations of federal statutes or regulations.
Last week, the House approved two bills intended to improve prescription drug pricing transparency for patients. H.R. 2115, the Public Disclosure of Drug Discounts Act, requires CMS to publish certain payment information regarding pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and prescription drugs. The House also approved H.R. 1781, Payment Commission Data Act of 2019, which together with H.R. 2115, proposes amending Titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to provide greater transparency of discounts provided by drug manufacturers. Both bills should now progress to the Senate for consideration.
Nursing Home Complaints: The Office of Inspector General (OIG) previously found that a few states fell short in the timely investigation of the most serious nursing home complaints between 2011 and 2015. To complement this report, the OIG published an interactive map that displays details on nursing home complaint trends between 2011 and 2015. The OIG then published a new interactive map to update the information for years 2016 through 2018.
Below are two recent New Jersey Federal District Court cases. In one matter, a group of Plaintiffs filed a class action against Quest regarding the difference in prices that Quest charges self-pay patients and patients with insurance. In the second case, a New Jersey Federal District Court awarded attorneys’ fees and costs to a defendant regarding a complaint filed by an out of network provider. Both of these cases may impact your practice.
New Jersey State: Selected Adopted Legislation
- S.4089 – Proposed – This bill permits long-term care facility personnel to assist residents with mail-in ballot; exempts long-term care facility employees from three ballot limit. For the complete statute, click here.