Executive Orders Issued by the Trump Administration Regarding the Inappropriateness of Guidance Documents Banner Image

Healthcare Law

Riker Danzig's Healthcare Group is involved in all aspects of the legal system that affect the planning, financing...

Executive Orders Issued by the Trump Administration Regarding the Inappropriateness of Guidance Documents

October 17, 2019

Two
Executive Orders: 84 FR 55235 and 84 FR 55239

Following
SCOTUS’ ruling in Azar v. Allina Health Services reported by us here,
in which the Court invalidated CMS’ Part C policy for failure to comply with
notice and comment rulemaking before applying the policy, the executive
orders issued by the Trump Administration on October 9, 2019 “Promoting the
Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents” and “Promoting the Rule
of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil Administrative Enforcement
and Adjudication” are both aimed at transparency in the regulatory process and
to curtail guidance documents from being improperly used by agencies in lieu of
following public notice-and-comment mandates of the Administrative Procedure
Act.

"Promoting
the Rule of Law Through Improved Agency Guidance Documents,” found here
at 84 FR 55235, has sweeping implications for agencies that “sometimes used
this authority inappropriately in attempts to regulate the public without
following the rulemaking procedures of the APA.” This executive order puts in
place certain requirements that agencies must follow such as providing the
opportunity for public comment before finalizing significant guidance, amend
existing regulations as necessary, and implement processes and procedures for
issuing guidance documents that includes procedures for the public to petition
for withdrawal or modification of a particular guidance document, and establish
or maintain on its website a “single, searchable, indexed database that
contains or links to all guidance documents in effect from such agency or
component” with a disclaimer noting “that guidance documents lack the force and
effect of law, except as authorized by law or as incorporated into a
contract.”

Specifically,
the order states an agency cannot treat failure to comply with a standard of
conduct announced solely in a guidance document as itself a violation of
applicable statutes or regulations. The guidance document cannot be used as a
prohibition of conduct but instead only to articulate the agency's
understanding of how a statute or regulation applies to particular
circumstances.   In sum, the executive order provides additional
protection for the public and providers by ensuring a  fair and
transparent regulatory process.

The
“Promoting the Rule of Law Through Transparency and Fairness in Civil
Administrative Enforcement and Adjudication” executive order, found here
at 84 FR 55239, is intended to safeguard against guidance documents being used
to impose new standards of conduct except as expressly authorized by law or as
expressly incorporated into a contract and to avoid unexpected penalties.

Star
Rating Update
:  Last
month, CMS released premium and cost-sharing data for Medicare Advantage
and Part D prescription drug plans for the 2020 calendar year, found here.
Earlier this month, the Trump Administration issued the executive order,
“Protecting and Improving Medicare for Our Nation’s Seniors” that authorizes the
Department of Health & Human Services to expand Medicare Advantage, reduce
fee-for-service, and level the playing field between MA plans and Medicare,
found here.
Then weeks later, CMS released its star ratings for 2020 Medicare
Advantage and prescription drug plans, found here.
Of all 210 MA-PD plans, fifty-two percent received four stars or above
for 2020. CMS found that 81 percent of MA-PD plan enrollees will be in a plan
rated four stars or more based on 2019 enrollment.  This is 12 percentage
points higher than it was in 2017.  We will continue to update you as
growing attention surrounds Medicare Advantage plans.

The list above does not include every proposed or adopted legislation, litigation or guidance document that may impact the healthcare industry.  Instead, it includes only a select few chosen by the authors, and any information in this Update is not intended to provide legal advice.  If you are concerned that a proposed or adopted legislation, litigation or guidance document may impact your practice, then you should seek legal advice. We send these Updates to our clients and friends to share our insights on new developments in the law. Nothing in this Update should be relied upon as legal advice in any particular matter. © 2019 Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti LLP.

Our Team

Get Our Latest Insights

Subscribe